Jump to content
Do Not Sell My Personal Information


  • Join Toyota Owners Club

    Join Europe's Largest Toyota Community! It's FREE!

     

     

State Pension - two-tier system . WHY?


Haliotis
 Share

Recommended Posts

I took voluntary redundancy when I was 61 and, instead of taking any lump sum, i left the whole amount to give me maximum private pension, and better increases per year.  The company also gave me a bout 80% of the value of the state pension until I reached pension age.  This was before Gordon Brown got his fingers on private pension dividends, and we got good annual increments - as much as 9% one year.  Also, the company increased my “temporary state pension” by the same percentages, along with my private pension.  This gave me two results - (1) my private pension at 65 was more than if I had stayed in work until then, and (2) my ‘temporary state pension” had grown beyond the real state pension, and that dropped slightly.  But, overall, I gained by not waiting until I was 65 to retire.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 9/4/2024 at 2:24 PM, Graham47 said:

Enough said !,

agreed

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jthspace said:

Agreed, but my State Pension is currently £12,535, just a few £££ short of the Personal Allowance, so if the triple lock gives me the rumoured £400 . . . 😭

 

Then you will pay tax on that over the threshold, not the whole lot, so you still gain. What is wrong with paying tax? I wish Govts would have the balls to increase income tax to improve public services, etc (with a rise in the lower threshold to protect the vulnerable) but it seems to be a sacred cow for all of them - including Labour bizarrely!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Corolly Poly said:

What is wrong with paying tax?

Nothing, the frozen personal allowance is the problem that will cause grief to lots of people less fortunate than myself. I already am in the higher tax bracket so 20% tax on the extra +/- £400 is neither here nor there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jthspace said:

Nothing, the frozen personal allowance is the problem that will cause grief to lots of people less fortunate than myself. I already am in the higher tax bracket so 20% tax on the extra +/- £400 is neither here nor there.

Hence my point to raise it with increased tax rates to protect the vulnerable. I too am fortunate enough to pay 40% tax on my pension but many of my friends/family who rely on the state pension alone would be unfairly punished if a rise in SP was partially offset by them coming into a tax position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


9 minutes ago, jthspace said:

Nothing, the frozen personal allowance is the problem that will cause grief to lots of people less fortunate than myself. I already am in the higher tax bracket so 20% tax on the extra +/- £400 is neither here nor there.

wouldn't you pay 40% (or more depending on which bracket you are in)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Corolly Poly said:

wouldn't you pay 40% (or more depending on which bracket you are in)?

20% from £12,570 up to £50,270

40% from £50,271 up to £125,140

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jthspace said:

20% from £12,570 up to £50,270

40% from £50,271 up to £125,140

"I already am in the higher tax bracket so 20% tax on the extra +/- £400 is neither here nor there."

you suggested you were already in a higher bracket so additional income would be taxed at that rate  - not 20%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Puglet said:

Throughout my working life the pension goal posts have moved a few times, which not only confusing but also plays havoc with so called 'retirement planning'. As mentioned thankfully I have some 'work' pensions and also a private pension to also rely on, whose terms and conditions have stayed constant thoughtout the years, good job to cos at least I can get at my private pension before my state pension retirement age, which thinking about it has also moved upwards in my working lifetime.

 

I worked out very early on after I left school in the 70s that the goal posts constantly moved so made the conscious decision to avoid national insurance all my working life (without breaking the law).

I got to retirement age and get a minimum amount but they make it up with some benefit or other and I end up with more than my wife who worked and paid. On top of that there is other stuff that comes free like dental and whatever.

The system is flawed. I have more money than I can spend and no way should I end up like that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latest Deals

Toyota Official Store for genuine Toyota parts & accessories

Disclaimer: As the club is an eBay Partner, The club may be compensated if you make a purchase via eBay links

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share







×
×
  • Create New...




Forums


News


Membership


  • Insurance
  • Support